In the Therapy Room: The Complexity of Cutting Ties and Preserving Emotional Authenticity

πŸšͺ When “Peace of Mind” Becomes the Priority

“I just can’t do fake anymore, Monica,” Bryson told me during our third session, hands clasped tightly as though holding onto his conviction. “When relationships start feeling forced, I’d rather walk away than waste energy pretending. Is that wrong?”

The quiet click of my office door closing behind Bryson that first day told me everything I needed to know about his approach to life. Deliberate. Final. A man who made decisions with certainty, even when those decisions involved walking away from people.

Over my twenty years as a therapist in Manchester, I’ve noticed something peculiar: men tend to view cutting ties as strategic, while women often frame the same action as either selfish or necessary healing. Bryson fell into a third category – the reluctant peacekeeper who’d rather burn a bridge than maintain a faltering connection.

Bryson was 42, successful in his career, and by all external measures, doing well. Yet he’d developed a pattern of completely severing relationships at the first sign of difficulty. Friends who disappointed him. Colleagues whose company felt draining. Even family members whose interactions just left him feeling hollow.

This pattern often conceals an emotional byte – this is a complex unit of feeling containing not just surface emotion (frustration), but also physical sensations (tightness in his chest during inauthentic conversations), unmet needs (for genuine connection), and a powerful narrative: “I must protect my peace at all costs.”

πŸ’” The Hidden Cost of Clean Breaks

“Tell me about the first time you remember walking away from someone,” I prompted during one session.

Bryson described a childhood friendship that ended when he discovered his best mate had been making fun of him behind his back. “I never spoke to him again. Didn’t even tell him why. Just… cut him loose – gone.”

This pattern had followed him through life. A girlfriend who’d lied about something minor – bang! relationship terminated without discussion. A friend who’d cancelled plans twice in a row – see you later, friendship over. Each time, Bryson felt he was making a healthy choice, protecting himself from disappointment.

What feels like self-protection can sometimes be an automatic emotional script – a behavioral pattern that runs on autopilot. For Bryson, that script was simple: “Detect inauthenticity, terminate connection, preserve peace of mind.”

What he couldn’t see was how this script was ultimately undermining the very peace he sought. πŸ”„

πŸƒ Finding the Middle Path

I use a simple teacup metaphor with clients like Bryson. “Imagine relationships as teacups. Some genuinely crack beyond repair and need to be discarded. Others develop small chips but remain perfectly functional – they just need careful handling. The wisdom lies in knowing the difference.”

We explored what I call the “needs hierarchy” in relationships. Bryson had prioritized his identity needs (authenticity) and psychological needs (autonomy) while overlooking his equally important relational needs (connection, support) and emotional needs (belonging).

“So you’re saying I should just put up with relationships that feel draining?” he asked, defensive.

“Not at all. I’m suggesting there’s territory between complete engagement and complete disengagement. Boundaries exist so that bridges don’t have to burn.” πŸŒ‰

βš–οΈ The Courage of Gradual Distance

Here’s what people don’t realize: it often takes more courage to create measured distance than to make clean breaks. Complete cutoffs provide immediate relief and control, while maintaining partial connections requires tolerating discomfort and navigating complexity.

For Bryson, this meant experimenting with what felt like half-measures:

  • Reducing contact without eliminating it
  • Expressing disappointment without ending relationships
  • Giving people opportunities to adapt to his needs before deciding they couldn’t meet them

“I had this colleague, Sarah. Normally I’d have just stopped engaging with her after she made that comment about my project. Instead, I told her it bothered me.” His expression mixed surprise and pride. “She apologized. Actually seemed to mean it.” ✨

This wasn’t just about saving relationships – it was about Bryson developing emotional granularity, transforming overwhelming emotional “bubbles” into manageable “fizz” of distinct, nuanced feelings. Where he once saw only black-and-white options, he began seeing shades of gray.

πŸ•ŠοΈ The Balance of Peace and Connection

By our final sessions, Bryson had developed a more sophisticated emotional navigation system. He still valued his peace of mind, but recognized that real peace comes not from avoiding all relationship challenges, but from having the tools to manage them effectively.

“I think what I was really afraid of was being trapped in relationships where I had to compromise who I am. But I was using a sledgehammer when sometimes a gentle tap would do.”

Bryson’s journey reminds me of an enduring principle: Our need for connection and our need for authenticity are not opposing forces, but complementary aspects of a fulfilling life. The art lies in honoring both. πŸ’«


β€”Monica Dean, who knows that preserving your peace doesn’t have to mean burning every bridge; sometimes it just means controlling how much traffic you allow to cross.

Leave a Reply