The Man Who Researched His Own Exit 🖤
Thaddeus walked into my office that November afternoon carrying the weight of someone who had already decided to leave. He was forty-three, successful by conventional measures, and utterly convinced that his life had become intolerable. When I asked him directly—without mercy, as is my practice—”What made you decide that death was preferable to living?” he didn’t flinch.
“I’ve been researching aconitum seeds,” he said quietly. “Monkshood. I want honesty about what would happen to my body.”
Not vague ideation. Methodical investigation. But here’s what he was really asking: Does anyone see me as worth saving?
The Architecture of Hopelessness 🏗️
Thaddeus’s despair wasn’t weakness. It was the logical output of an emotional system organized around a single conclusion: There is no way forward that doesn’t involve unbearable pain.
Over years, his emotional system had crystallized into a rigid frame—the interpretive lens through which he filtered all experience. Within that frame, the narrative was relentlessly consistent: I am a burden. My existence causes more suffering than it alleviates.
This frame wasn’t irrational. It was internally coherent. His system had organized all available evidence into a tight logical architecture. The problem wasn’t that it was faulty—it was that it had become rigid, functioning as a closed emotional script: an automatic pathway that felt inevitable because his system had stopped generating alternatives.
But his despair also contained information. Beneath the research on poisons lay genuine psychological and relational deprivation that his conscious mind had learned to ignore.
The Invisible Structures Shaping Everything 👁️
What emerged in our first session was the presence of invisible structures: the unspoken family dynamics and culturally internalized expectations shaping his emotional experience without his awareness.
Thaddeus grew up in a family where emotional vulnerability was treated as weakness. His father was stoic and pragmatic. His mother was the family’s emotional caretaker, leaving no room for Thaddeus’s own needs. He learned early: Your feelings are someone else’s burden. The strong contain themselves.
This attachment pattern became encoded in his inner voice—that internal narrator who transforms experience into story. Over decades, this voice had become increasingly critical, increasingly convinced of his fundamental inadequacy. By the time he arrived at my office, his inner voice had evolved into what I call an alien self: a harsh, punitive commentator functioning as an internal persecutor.
The research on aconitum was, in a twisted way, an act of obedience to that alien self. The pathology of the closed system is that it generates proof of its own thesis.
Naming the Judge 🏛️
I asked Thaddeus to name the entity that had become his primary relationship. Not metaphorically. Literally.
“What would you call this voice that convinces you that death is mercy?”
He paused. “The Judge.”
In the traditions I work with, what we call “demons” are fundamentally the rejected, demonized aspects of our own psyche. The Judge wasn’t external. It was the internalized voice of every authority figure who had taught him that his needs were inconvenient, his emotions were weakness, his authentic self was fundamentally unacceptable.
But here’s the crucial insight: The Judge only had power because Thaddeus had ceded it authority. He had accepted its premise that judgment equals truth, that criticism equals wisdom, that suffering equals deserved punishment.
The rejected aspects of Thaddeus—his anger, his hunger for recognition, his desire to be genuinely witnessed—had been driven into the shadow precisely because his family system couldn’t tolerate them. Now those exiled parts were organizing themselves into a vengeful internal force.
The Container Under Siege ⚔️
His mind is a container—a sophisticated organizational system designed for survival. Within that container lives what I call an internal committee: various psychological processes (the Achiever, the People-Pleaser, the Protector, the Critic) all trying to maintain what the system craves above all else: coherence.
The problem: His system had become locked into a paradoxical position. One part desperately wanted connection. Another part had concluded he was fundamentally unworthy of it. A third part had learned that survival meant never asking for help. A fourth part was now organizing the fantasy of exit as the only solution that could resolve the unbearable tension between these contradictions.
This is what I call the Coherence Drive run amok. The system, desperate for internal harmony, had begun to organize itself around suicide not as an impulse but as a solution. If he removed himself, the problem disappeared. Everyone else could stop being burdened. He could stop experiencing contradiction.
From Overwhelm to Information 🔍
Thaddeus needed emotional granularity: the ability to transform the monolithic bubble of despair into something differentiated, manageable, something that contained information rather than just weight.
I asked him to slow down. Not the research—the actual emotional experience.
“When you feel the hopelessness most acutely, describe it. Not the thought. The actual sensation.”
He described a heaviness in his chest, numbness in his extremities, a particular quality of silence where thoughts had stopped generating alternatives. Radical separateness from other people, as if observing human connection through thick glass.
Those sensations weren’t just symptoms of depression. The heaviness spoke to a need for release. The numbness spoke to a need for aliveness. The isolation spoke to relational hunger so deep and so defended against that he’d nearly forgotten what genuine connection felt like.
These weren’t things to eliminate. They were things to understand, decode, and work with.
Ritual as Psychological Technology 🔥
I designed what I call a ritual of descent: a ceremony that would allow Thaddeus to consciously engage with the despair he’d been trying to escape through poison.
He took an object from his childhood—a medal his father had given him for academic achievement. The kind of award given conditional on performance, never on being.
In a quiet space, he would:
- Acknowledge the structure: Speak aloud what this object represented—the bargain he’d made to be acceptable, the price paid in authentic self.
- Invoke the rejected authority: Name the voice that had used this medal as a weapon. “I name you, Judge. I see your hunger to protect me by demanding perfection.”
- Perform the sacrifice: Burn it, bury it, or give it away—some deliberate act of release. “I release this currency. I refuse to trade my aliveness for your approval.”
- Declare the reversal: “By my own hand and will, I reclaim the parts of myself you exiled. Not to become reckless. To become whole.”
This isn’t prayer to external forces. It’s the conscious reorganization of his own internal system. It’s creating a positive disintegration—intentionally destabilizing the rigid coherence built around despair so new configurations become possible.
Wyrd and Personal Agency ⚡
There’s a concept from Norse traditions called wyrd—often translated as “fate,” but more accurately understood as the pattern of consequences emerging from your choices and actions over time.
The Norse didn’t believe in passive fate. They believed destiny was something you made through the decisions you took, the oaths you swore, the honor you defended.
I told Thaddeus: “Suicide isn’t an escape from your wyrd. It’s a capitulation to it. It’s the moment you stop being the architect and become only the victim of circumstances.”
His research on poisons was actually an act of will. But it was will deployed in service of surrender. What I asked him to do was redirect that same capacity—that same methodical thinking, research, decisive action—toward a different question: What would it mean to live with full knowledge of my pain, rather than trying to escape it?
This isn’t toxic positivity. It’s recognizing that the capacity for agency you’re deploying toward death could be deployed toward transformation.
Seeing the System 👓
Over the following months, Thaddeus’s work was about developing meta-emotional intelligence—the capacity to see the systems creating his emotions rather than being possessed by them.
We mapped his needs hierarchy. Psychological autonomy—he’d surrendered it entirely to the Judge. Emotional safety—he’d learned it meant numbness and disconnection. Relational availability—he’d convinced himself others were better off without him.
We examined his emotional scripts—the automatic patterns keeping him locked in the same loops. When he felt genuine connection, the Protector would activate: This is dangerous. Better to withdraw now. When he accomplished something, the Achiever would whisper: Not good enough. You’re still fundamentally inadequate.
The scripts were so smooth, so practiced, they felt like truth. But here’s what changed: Once he could see the script running, he could interrupt it.
He told a colleague about a genuine struggle. The colleague didn’t disappear or judge. He attended a therapy group with others carrying comparable despair. Something shifted in the isolation—not removed entirely, but fractured enough that connection became possible.
He didn’t become “recovered” in some clean, linear fashion. But he became interested again. And interest is the first sign that the coherence drive has stopped organizing exclusively around death.
A Necessary Truth ✊
Our culture treats suicidal ideation with particular cruelty. We tell people it’s “selfish.” We suggest their pain isn’t “real.” We pathologize what is actually a symptom of profound unmet needs organized into a closed system. None of this helps. It deepens the isolation.
What actually helps is what Thaddeus needed: Someone willing to take his pain seriously without taking his conclusions as inevitable. Someone who could say: Yes, you’re in genuine suffering. No, death isn’t the solution because it prevents the only thing that could actually help—transformation.
The poison he researched kills the body. But what he actually needed wasn’t death. He needed the death of the rigid structures imprisoning him. The dissolution of the Judge’s authority. The disintegration of the closed system so that integration—real, messy, complicated integration—could become possible.
The Work Continues 🌱
I won’t pretend Thaddeus is “cured.” That’s not how this works. What I will say is that last month he sat across from me and for the first time, he mentioned a future plan that wasn’t framed as escape. He’s considering going back to school for something he’d abandoned twenty years ago because his father had deemed it impractical. He’s joined a band—something he loved before he learned joy was indulgence.
These aren’t dramatic transformations. They’re small acts of reclaiming agency. They’re what happens when someone stops asking How do I escape? and starts asking How do I become the author of my own story?
That’s the work of shadow integration. That’s the work of ritual as psychological technology. That’s the work of claiming your authentic will, even—especially—when the systems that raised you taught you that your will was dangerous.
By your own hand and will, Thaddeus discovered that suicide wasn’t his wyrd. It was just a story the Judge had convinced him was inevitable.
He chose a different story.
—Lucian Blackwood
Hail Wisdom. Hail Yourself. Hail Your Becoming.
The demon is not your enemy. It’s the rejected authority you’ve learned to obey. The moment you recognize it as internal, the moment you name it, you’ve already begun the work of reclaiming your power.
- Aconite Poisoning: From Crisis to Healing – PMC
- Aconitine – Wikipedia
- Monkshood Poisoning: What to Know – WebMD
- Aconite poisoning – PubMed
- Aconitum napellus (monkshood): A purple poison
- Poisoning Associated with Consumption of a Homemade Medicinal…
- A Narrative Review of Aconite Poisoning and Management
